Photograph of a grasshopper.

Link to Home.
Link to ID Tools.
Link to Outbreak Information.
Link to Management.
Link to IPM Handbook.
Link to Support Software.
Link to NPARL Research.
Link to Mormon Cricket.
Link to What's New.
Link to Links Page.
Link to Order CD.
Link to Site Map.
Link to Search/Index.
Contact Us -- webmaster[at]sidney.ars.usda.gov

Grasshoppers: Their Biology, Identification and Management.
User Handbook.

Section II: Chemical Control (14 of 22)

Section Contents

IPM Handbook Contents

Previous Article
Next Article

Download the PDF Version of this Article.

 

II.14 Effect of Multiple Concentrations and Rates of Carbaryl-Bran Bait

Mark A. Quinn, R. Nelson Foster, and K. C. Reuter

Introduction
Multiple Concentrations and Rates of Bran Bait-A Case Study
Conclusions
References

Introduction

Insecticidal baits are a viable alternative to conventional insecticidal sprays for controlling grasshoppers (Quinn et al. 1989). Baits are particularly effective when the grasshopper community is composed largely of bran acceptors, or those species that readily consume bran baits (see chapter II.12 on bait acceptance). Most of the recent studies involving bran baits have used concentrations in the range of 2-5 percent toxicant at rates near 1.5 lb/acre. The efficacy of higher concentrations and rates has not been studied extensively. As part of the Grasshopper Integrated Pest Management Project, a study was conducted in northwestern South Dakota to determine the effects of multiple concentrations and rates of carbaryl bran bait on grasshoppers on mixed-grass rangeland.

Back to Top of Page

Multiple Concentrations and Rates of Bran Bait-A Case Study

Fifty-one 40-acre plots were treated with aerial applications of carbaryl bran bait in the following concentrations and rates: 2 percent carbaryl at 0.5, 1, 2, 5, and 10 lb/acre; 5 percent carbaryl at 0.5, 1, and 2 lb/acre; and 10 percent carbaryl at 0.5, 1, and 2 lb/acre. An additional nine plots were used as controls. The baits were applied with a Cessna Ag Truck operating at an altitude of 40-60 ft at 115 miles per hour (mi/hour) and equipped with a standard Transland 20244 spreader. Swath widths were 45 ft. Treatments were applied over a 17-day period from June 27 to July 13, 1987. Approximately 56 percent of grasshoppers were in the nymphal stage at the time of treatments (table II.14-1).

Densities of grasshoppers were estimated in the center of each plot by counting grasshoppers in 40 0.1-m2 rings (Onsager and Henry 1977) placed approximately 16 ft apart in a 210-ft-diameter circle. Relative abundance of each grasshopper species and instar was determined by collecting grasshoppers near the circle of rings with a sweep net. Densities of individual species were estimated by multiplying their relative abundance by total grasshopper density. Grasshopper populations were monitored before treatment and 2, 4, and 7 days after treatments. Populations were monitored approximately daily from June 26 to July 20 in the control plots.

Changes in densities of total grasshoppers, bran-accepting species, and bran-rejecting species in the control plots were compared with changes in plots treated with the insecticidal baits to determine overall treatment effects. Major bran-accepting species included Melanoplus sanguinipes, other Melanoplus species, Ageneotettix deorum, Phoetaliotes nebrascensis, and Aulocara elliotti. Bran-rejecting species included Aeropedellus clavatus, Amphitornus coloradus, Trachyrhachys kiowa, and Opeia obscura. Although O. obscura may be vulnerable to insecticidal baits (see the bait acceptance chapter in this section), we included it in the bran-rejector category because it was not affected by the insecticidal bait in our particular study.

Mean pretreatment densities of total grasshoppers ranged from 13.1 to 22 grasshoppers/yd2 in the treatment plots. M. sanguinipes, A. deorum, and A. clavatus constituted 32, 15, and 14 percent of all grasshopper species, respectively, during the pretreatment period (table II.14-1). Bran acceptors constituted 72 percent of all species.

All insecticidal bait treatments, except the 2 percent carbaryl at 0.5 lb/acre, caused significant reductions in total grasshopper density compared with controls (table II.14-2). The greatest mean mortalities, ranging from 72 to 86 percent, occurred in plots treated with 2 percent carbaryl bran bait at 5 and 10 lb/acre, 5 percent carbaryl bran bait at 1 lb/acre, and 10 percent carbaryl at 2 lb/acre. The more standard treatments of 2 percent carbaryl at 1 and 2 lb/acre gave intermediate results, causing average mortalities of 52 and 64 percent, respectively. Applications of bran bait at 0.5 lb/acre were least effective, killing less than 50 percent of all grasshoppers.

All treatments caused significant mortality of bran-accepting species of grasshoppers compared with controls (table II.14-2). The greatest mortality occurred in plots treated with 2 percent carbaryl at 10 lb/acre (97 percent), 5 percent carbaryl at 2 lb/acre (90 percent), 2 percent carbaryl at 5 lb/acre (90 percent), and 5 percent carbaryl at 1 lb/acre (88 percent). The commonly used treatments of 2 percent carbaryl at 1 or 2 lb/acre caused 72 and 89 percent mortalities, respectively, of bran-accepting grasshopper species. Applications of 2 and 5 percent carbaryl at 0.5 lb/acre caused 45-54 percent reductions in the bran acceptors. Densities did not change in control plots.

In general, bran-rejecting species were not affected by the treatments (table II.14-2). However, the greatest reduction in bran rejectors (60 percent) occurred in plots treated with 2 percent carbaryl at 10 lb/acre. Because changes in densities in these plots were highly variable, it could not be determined if this reduction was caused by mortality or natural variation in grasshopper populations.

Back to Top of Page

Conclusions

The following conclusions can be drawn from the study. First, the quantity of carbaryl bran bait applied to rangeland affects grasshopper mortality. Baits applied at 0.5 lb/acre are relatively ineffective. The highest rates (5 and 10 lb/acre) were very effective in controlling grasshoppers. These results do not suggest, however, that more bait is always better (see chapter II.15 on multiple applications of bran bait). For example, 78 percent mortality was achieved in plots treated with 5 percent carbaryl at 1 lb/acre. Also, the small increase in mortality caused by higher rates may not be economically justifiable.

Second, the concentration of carbaryl seemed less important than the rate of application. For example, 2 and 10 percent carbaryl applied at a rate of 2 lb/acre caused similar grasshopper mortalities. Finally, high mortality of grasshoppers was achieved because the grasshopper community was composed mainly of the bran-accepting Melanoplus species. Insecticidal baits are less effective when there is a higher proportion of bran-rejecting species (Quinn et al. 1989, Jech et al. 1993).

Back to Top of Page

Previous Article Next Article Section II Contents

References Cited

Jech, L. E.; Foster, R. N.; Colletto, D.; Walgenbach, D. D.; Roland, T. J.; Rodriguez, G. D.; Bohls, R.; Houston, R. D.; Meeks, W. K.; Queener, R. L.; Jackson, C. L.; Dines, J. L.; Puclik, M. J.; Scott, A. K. 1993. Field evaluation of diflubenzuron and carbaryl bran baits against grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) populations in South Dakota. Journal of Economic Entomology 86: 557-565.

Onsager, J. A.; Henry, J. E. 1977. A method for estimating the density of rangeland grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in experimental plots. Acrida 6: 231-237.

Quinn, M. A.; Kepner, R. L.; Walgenbach, D. D.; Bohls, R. A.; Pooler, P. D.; Foster, R. N.; Reuter, K. C.; Swain, J. L. 1989. Immediate and 2nd-year effects of insecticidal spray and bait treatments on populations of rangeland grasshoppers. Canadian Entomologist 121: 589-602.

Back to Top of Page

Previous Article Next Article Section II Contents

 

Table II.14-1-Relative abundance of grasshopper species and instars and number of plots occupied on the pretreatment sampling dates, June 26-July 7, 1987, Harding County, SD

Species

No. of plots occupied

Percentage of grasshoppers1

Percentage of individuals in each instar

Adult

I

II

III

IV

V

Melanoplus sanguinipes (F.)

55

  32.31

  0.0

  0.9

13.6

17.0

32.1

  36.4

Ageneotettix deorum (Scudder)

55

  14.35

  0.0

  0.8

  4.6

15.2

57.6

  21.8

Aeropedellus clavatus (Thomas)

51

  13.95

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

100.0

Melanoplus dawsonii (Scudder)

40

    5.31

  0.4

  4.7

23.8

27.7

20.6

  22.8

Melanoplus confusus Scudder

47

    4.57

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

  0.0

100.0

Amphitornus coloradus (Thomas)

50

    4.55

  0.0

  0.0

  2.7

  9.5

43.1

  44.6

Melanoplus infantilis Scudder

44

    3.76

  0.2

  2.8

15.9

15.3

31.7

  34.0

Trachyrhachys kiowa Thomas

48

    2.50

  0.0

  0.6

10.5

16.8

35.0

  37.1

Melanoplus spp.

38

    2.32

25.0

74.6

  0.0

  0.0

  0.4

    0.0

Orphulella speciosa (Scudder)

31

    2.13

  0.4

  2.0

11.8

34.1

29.5

  22.2

Phoetaliotes nebrascensis (Thomas)

39

    2.10

  4.5

40.1

36.7

14.8

  3.9

  0.0

Aulocara elliotti Thomas

38

    1.92

  0.0

  0.0

  0.5

  0.8

20.0

  78.7

Melanoplus packardii (Scudder)

46

    1.47

  0.6

  4.9

16.0

38.8

32.8

    8.7

Melanoplus femurrubrum (DeGeer)

17

    1.36

  6.1

20.8

42.8

15.6

11.0

    3.7

Melanoplus bivittatus (Say)

34

    1.30

  0.0

  1.5

  5.7

12.8

15.1

  64.8

Opeia obscura (Thomas)

39

    1.19

  0.0

  2.4

15.3

39.3

36.1

    6.9

Others (26 species)

-

    4.91

  6.8

10.6

13.6

14.3

23.0

  31.7

All species

55

100.00

  1.1

  4.3

10.0

13.7

27.3

  43.6

1Based on a total of 12,063 grasshoppers collected

Back to Top of Page

Table II.14-2-Pretreatment densities and reductions in grasshopper densities 7 days after treatments with different rates and concentrations of carbaryl bran bait, Harding County, SD

Grasshopper variable

Treatment1

Pretreatment density2
(x ± SEM) standard error of the means

Percent reduction3
(x ± SEM)

 Total grasshoppers

Control

13.7 ± 1.91a

8.1 ± 12.66a

2% - 0.5

12.5 ± 2.43a

31.3 ± 10.69abcd

2% - 1.0

13.8 ± 0.61a

51.7 ± 17.01be

2% - 2.0

17.4 ± 2.81a

63.9 ± 2.17efgh

2% - 5.0

17.4 ± 4.21a

75.3 ± 8.20gk

2% -10.0

20.1 ± 6.57a

85.9 ± 7.91k

5% - 0.5

16.4 ± 1.40a

37.4 ± 15.58bcdf

5% - 1.0

18.6 ± 5.53a

77.9 ± 7.54hk

5% - 2.0

18.0 ± 4.92a

56.0 ± 8.05ceg

10% - 0.5

12.0 ± 2.83a

49.9 ± 5.98bcdf

10% - 1.0

13.9 ± 2.39a

58.7 ± 3.81deg

10% - 2.0

17.3 ± 2.33a

72.3 ± 4.71ek

 Bran acceptors 

Control

9.4 ± 1.43a

5.7 ± 12.77a

2% - 0.5

8.7 ± 1.42a

45.2 ± 19.72b

2% - 1.0

8.4 ± 0.60a

60.2 ± 17.80bcd

2% - 2.0

11.3 ± 1.40a

77.5 ± 4.85cdef

2% - 5.0

13.6 ± 4.53a

89.6 ± 5.79fg

2% -10.0

17.0 ± 5.23a

97.4 ± 2.34g

5% - 0.5

12.6 ± 1.30a

53.5 ± 11.42bc

5% - 1.0

15.1 ± 4.45a

87.9 ± 6.98efg

5% - 2.0

10.2 ± 2.44a

89.8 ± 1.25efg

10% - 0.5

  8.2 ± 2.22a

72.1 ± 8.67cde

10% - 1.0

10.1 ± 1.12a

69.5 ± 4.07bcd

10% - 2.0

13.8 ± 1.74a

80.8 ± 8.47def

 Bran rejectors 

Control

3.4 ± 0.63a

0.1 ± 16.62ab

2% - 0.5

3.1 ± 0.86a

-34.6 ± 24.01b

2% - 1.0

3.2 ± 0.54a

34.6 ± 29.41ac

2% - 2.0

5.7 ± 1.90a

-27.0 ± 44.99ab

2% - 5.0

2.5 ± 0.28a

37.8 ± 8.79ab

2% -10.0

4.6 ± 1.13a

59.6 ± 28.41c

5% - 0.5

3.7 ± 0.44a

8.5 ± 27.83ab

5% - 1.0

3.4 ± 1.12a

33.4 ± 13.77ab

5% - 2.0

7.7 ± 2.47a

9.1 ± 20.79ab

10% - 0.5

3.2 ± 0.45a

15.4 ± 20.98ab

10% - 1.0

3.3 ± 1.33a

12.2 ± 43.52ab

10% - 2.0

3.3 ± 1.00a

-112.0 ± 117.23b

1Percent of carbaryl applied-application rate in lb/acre.
2No./yd2.
3A negative percent reduction indicates an increase in grasshoppers.
Note: Means within columns followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.1 level (Fisher's protected SD).

 

Back to Top of Page

Previous Article Next Article Section II Contents

Download the PDF Version of this Article.

Logos

USDA ARS Home User Handbook ID Tools New Research Support Sofware NPARL Research Extras Index What's New Order CD Site Map